For hard-FM and technical-service providers: see how a site-based job moves from the office to the field, then to evidence, review and a supported customer record.
Compare the structured EICR review or all service workflows.
A planned plant-room visit and a reactive repair can both begin as site-linked jobs. The screens below are genuine captures from a fictional showcase tenant, showing different records and stages — not one invented end-to-end job.
Record a planned visit or reactive request against a customer and site. Add the job type, date, assignee and, where relevant, an SLA target. The week view makes scheduled work visible; it does not promise that every contract rule is automated.
An assigned engineer sees their current job and remaining schedule on the field view. Subcontractor access exists with role and job scope controls; agree the subcontractor handoff and sign-off process during implementation rather than assuming unrestricted dispatch.
The office can inspect the job record, attendance and commercial progression. Where work leads to an EICR, its observations have a separate controlled review and release path. Neither is a blanket approval process for every trade.
For the supported EICR path, qualified people review the findings before release. The customer-scoped portal then lets an authorised customer open a released certificate and PDF. This screenshot does not imply that every FM document or job is automatically published.
FM uses Curcle’s shared jobs, sites, scheduling, assignments and evidence tools. Electrical EICR has a dedicated structured review and release workflow. Specialist maintenance schedules, contract rules, regulatory forms and customer outputs need to be agreed for your operation; Curcle does not claim built-in SFG20 alignment or universal audit packs.
Explore the real screens, then bring a planned visit, reactive call-out or certificate handoff to a workflow-specific demo.
